Blog 1 – Lexington Market in the Baltimore Sun
In looking at the historical articles from the Baltimore
Heritage list, I was struck by the continuing debates through the twentieth
century over how to maintain and finance the markets as patterns of
food-distribution and shopping changed.
In the 1920’s much of the discussion related to the need for parking to
accommodate automobiles. After the 1949
fire which gutted the original buildings, the city got a temporary structure in
place in 6 months and new buildings opened in April, 1952. The city took this opportunity to
restructure the financial relationship with stall-holders, resulting in
lawsuits. These new buildings were
financed by a 25 year $5.7 million bond, managed by an independent
authority. However the market did not
generate enough revenue to meet the repayment schedule, and the next crisis was
in 1979 when the bonds came due and $3 million of the balance remained to be
paid. The buildings also required major
renovation. After much discussion, new
financing was arranged by the city which resulted in the opening of the Arcade
in 1982.
The 1990’s found Lexington Market surrounded by crime but
supported by people who used it. Of the
27 articles with Lexington Market in the title, 11 were about crimes committed
in the area, although only 1 occurred in the Market. About half of the non-crime articles in the
mid-1990’s were written by reporters with fond memories of the Market as they
described continuing to go there. The
Sun food writer, Rob Kasper, wrote twice about bringing his kids to the
market. In 1997, Jean Marbella profiled
91-year-old Robert Rawls who had been skinning and boning fish at Faidley’s
Seafood for 55 years. He still loved his
job and the customers who asked for him by name, although he shifted to a
part-time schedule in his mid-80’s. The
Sun printed his obituary 2 years later. By
2000, a series of articles tracked the beginning of the long debate about how
to renovate the Market.
The Gamble article ended by pointing to a 200+ year debate
about who the market is for, a question at the heart of this class as we
consider the context for current proposals to rebuild the market. How should one weigh the importance of the
community currently being served by the market against the city’s desire to
attract more affluent residents to downtown?
I like your concluding question: "How should one weigh the importance of the community currently being served by the market against the city’s desire to attract more affluent residents to downtown?" It speaks to the complexities of inequality in the history of development and redevelopment. In addition, you give a clear, no-nonsense overview of the history of LM reported in the Sun from 1991-2000. As a historian and a doctoral student coming into Baltimore public history, a suggestion I would have is to add more flavor/voice and build narrative tension in your writing in future assignments. Tell the story (accurately using research, of course) but also add analysis and some of those vivid quotes that make a place come alive. Solid work.
ReplyDelete